From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Lahey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 5, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P

09-05-2011

JOSEPH B. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. LAHEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 14, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. The November 1, 2010 motion for summary judgment is granted, and defendants Lahey, Tan and Traquina are dismissed from this case with prejudice.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Matthews v. Lahey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 5, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Matthews v. Lahey

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. LAHEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 5, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2011)