From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Lahey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P.

September 30, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 26, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 79) is denied.


Summaries of

Matthews v. Lahey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Matthews v. Lahey

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. LAHEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2415 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)