From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 10, 2015
Case No. 5:13 CV 1850 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 5:13 CV 1850

02-10-2015

Robert L. Matthews, Petitioner, v. Kevin Jones, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed January 22, 2015 (Doc. 16). The R&R recommends this Court deny Petitioner's request for counsel and further recommends the Petition be dismissed as procedurally defaulted.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court denies the Petition and dismisses this case with prejudice. This Court further declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jack Zouhary

JACK ZOUHARY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

February 10, 2015


Summaries of

Matthews v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 10, 2015
Case No. 5:13 CV 1850 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Matthews v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Robert L. Matthews, Petitioner, v. Kevin Jones, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 5:13 CV 1850 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Turner

In making the determination as to whether to exercise its discretion in appointing counsel on a petitioner's…

Davidson v. Warden, Warren Corr. Inst.

In making the determination as to whether to exercise its discretion in appointing counsel on a petitioner's…