From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Hui

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 27, 2012
No. 2: 07-cv-1418 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 07-cv-1418 GEB CKD P

08-27-2012

SCOTT CHARLES MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. HUI, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has been made aware that the matter was settled by Magistrate Judge Kellison on May 2, 2012. (See Dkt. No. 100.) In light of the settlement between the parties, the pending outstanding motions will be denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motions for the issuance of subpoenas (Dkt. Nos. 83 & 85.) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
2. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No. 86.) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. Plaintiff's motions to compel (Dkt. Nos. 90 & 91.) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
4. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to review the state's pretrial statement (Dkt. No. 92) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Matthews v. Hui

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 27, 2012
No. 2: 07-cv-1418 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Matthews v. Hui

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT CHARLES MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. HUI, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 07-cv-1418 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2012)