From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Gucci

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 15, 2022
Civil Action 21-434-KSM (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-434-KSM

02-15-2022

MADISON MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. GUCCI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants Gucci America, Inc. and Kering's Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Sanctions (Doc. No. 12), Plaintiff Madison Matthews's response (Doc. No. 14), Defendants' reply (Doc. No. 16), following oral argument on the motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows:

Defendants represent that Matthews wrongly identified “Kering” as a Defendant and that the company's official name is Kering Americas, Inc. (See, e.g., Doc. No. 12; Doc. No. 12-2 at ¶ 1.)

1. Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED.
2. Defendants' Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice.
3. Since the parties are to engage in private arbitration, and no party has requested a stay pending that private arbitration, the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Matthews v. Gucci

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 15, 2022
Civil Action 21-434-KSM (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Matthews v. Gucci

Case Details

Full title:MADISON MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. GUCCI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 15, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-434-KSM (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2022)