From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Bayer Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Oct 13, 2005
Civil Action No. 2:01cv802-T (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 13, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:01cv802-T (WO).

October 13, 2005


ORDER


It is ORDERED that the motion to modify judgment of dismissal (Doc. No. 74) is granted as follows:

(1) The final judgment (Doc. No. 69) is amended as follows:
(A) All claims against defendants Bayer Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline are dismissed with prejudice.
(B) The claims against defendant Whitehall-Robins, a division of American Home Products Corporation, are not dismissed.

(C) The final judgment is otherwise unchanged.

(2) The claims against defendant Whitehall-Robins, a division of American Home Products Corporation, are reinstated.
(3) The parties are allowed until October 26, 2005, to file their Rule 26(f) report.


Summaries of

Matthews v. Bayer Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Oct 13, 2005
Civil Action No. 2:01cv802-T (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Matthews v. Bayer Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY MATTHEWS, as Administratrix of the Estate of LULA MAE CALHOUN…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Oct 13, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:01cv802-T (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 13, 2005)