From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER, YOEL v. MONROE-WOODBURY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1999
258 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 16, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (LaCava, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see, Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge the determination of the Monroe-Woodbury Central School District (hereinafter Monroe-Woodbury) to sell four used school buses to another school district following the submission of bids. The relief sought by the petitioner was a judgment directing Monroe-Woodbury to accept the petitioner's bid as the highest qualified bid and to sell the buses to it. The petitioner obtained an order staying the sale and, transfer of the buses to the other school district pending the determination of the proceeding. The Supreme Court subsequently dismissed the proceeding on the merits and vacated the stay. Although the petitioner appealed, it did not seek any further stay. Thereafter, during the pendency of this appeal, and consistent with the judgment of the Supreme Court, the sale of the buses went forward, and Monroe-Woodbury avers that it no longer owns or possesses the vehicles. Given these circumstances, the relief sought by the petitioner is no longer available, and the rights of the parties will not be directly affected by the resolution of this appeal ( see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707). Accordingly, this appeal has been rendered academic, and dismissal is appropriate ( see, Merenda v. Lisi, 244 A.D.2d 535; People ex rel. Smalls v. Tekben, 193 A.D.2d 828; Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 169 A.D.2d 943; Matter of Serafin v. Wallace, 117 A.D.2d 926).

Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

MATTER, YOEL v. MONROE-WOODBURY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1999
258 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

MATTER, YOEL v. MONROE-WOODBURY

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CONGREGATION BNEI YOEL, Appellant, v. MONROE-WOODBURY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 457

Citing Cases

Romaro Corp. v. Sea & Sky Garden, Inc.

The Supreme Court directed the defendants to file a subdivision application and, in effect, denied that…

In re Michael

Under the particular circumstances of this case, this appeal has been rendered academic, and this matter does…