From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Zuckman v. Donohue

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 20, 1948
298 N.Y. 627 (N.Y. 1948)

Opinion

Argued August 20, 1948

Decided August 20, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, BOOKSTEIN, J.

Milton H. Friedman, Morris Zuckman and Sidney Fox for appellants.

Daniel H. Prior for respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY and DYE, JJ. DESMOND and FULD, JJ., dissent and vote to reinstate the order of Special Term in the following memorandum: "The court, all agree, may review the facts and determine where the weight of evidence lies (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 440, 602, 605). We differ with the majority in that we believe that the weight of evidence favors the determination made at Special Term. Taking no part: THACHER, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Zuckman v. Donohue

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 20, 1948
298 N.Y. 627 (N.Y. 1948)
Case details for

Matter of Zuckman v. Donohue

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MORRIS ZUCKMAN et al., Appellants, against THOMAS F…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 20, 1948

Citations

298 N.Y. 627 (N.Y. 1948)
81 N.E.2d 371

Citing Cases

Warren Co. Cons. Party v. Girard

Notwithstanding the absence of any factual basis therefor, the committee found that respondents were not in…

People v. Ohrenstein

The very purpose of party affiliation is to advance the political views and electoral fortunes of one faction…