From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Zorach v. Clauson, Spaulding

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1949
90 N.E.2d 68 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued December 1, 1949

Decided December 29, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, BELDOCK, J.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Kent H. Brown and Wendell P. Brown of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth W. Greenawalt and Leo Pfeffer for petitioners, respondents.

Charles H. Tuttle, Porter R. Chandler and Louis M. Loeb for intervener, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Zorach v. Clauson, Spaulding

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1949
90 N.E.2d 68 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Zorach v. Clauson, Spaulding

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TESSIM ZORACH et al., Respondents, against ANDREW G…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 29, 1949

Citations

90 N.E.2d 68 (N.Y. 1949)
90 N.E.2d 68

Citing Cases

Matter of Caparco v. Kaplan

However, the county wherein it is alleged in the petition that the material facts otherwise took place is…

Weingarten v. B.O.E. of City Sch. Dist. of N.Y

It involved a motion to change venue from Kings County to New York County in an article 78 proceeding…