From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Zaretsky v. N.Y. City Hlt. Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 19, 1993
196 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

August 19, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.).


Where an at-will employee fails to show that his termination violated a constitutional, statutory, or contractual provision a pre-termination hearing is not required (Matter of Bergamini v Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 62 N.Y.2d 897, 899). The IAS Court previously held that petitioner was an at-will employee of NYU. Petitioner had no civil service tenure or any other property right at NYU and, therefore, could be removed from that position without a hearing or even a statement of reasons. Moreover, the affiliation agreement between NYU and HHC provides that affiliate employees remain the employees of the affiliate hospital (NYU), indicating that petitioner's rights have never risen above those of an at-will employee. Petitioner cites only case law discussing probationary employees to support his contention that a pre-termination hearing was appropriate. Inasmuch as he was an at-will employee of NYU and not a probationary employee of HHC, the IAS Court erred in remanding the matter to afford petitioner a hearing to determine respondent's reasons for his termination.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Zaretsky v. N.Y. City Hlt. Hosp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 19, 1993
196 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Zaretsky v. N.Y. City Hlt. Hosp

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HERBERT ZARETSKY, Respondent-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 19, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
601 N.Y.S.2d 290

Citing Cases

CPLR Article 78 for a Writ of Certiorari v. Cnty. of Saratoga

Petitioner's first argument fails because it relies upon a line of cases dealing with termination of…