From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Zaepfel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 12, 1956
309 N.Y. 962 (N.Y. 1956)

Opinion

Argued October 13, 1955

Decided January 12, 1956

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Edward L. Robinson, Jr., Abel Klaw, William M. Fay, Solon J. Stone and William A. Bain, Jr., for appellant.

Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General ( Daniel Polansky, James O. Moore, Jr., and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent. George J. Hayes, Bernard Katzen and Victor Fiddler for Buffalo Stainless Casting Corporation and others, respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD and BURKE, JJ. FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence indicating that the death of claimant's husband was caused by his employment with E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company, Incorporated. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Claim of Zaepfel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 12, 1956
309 N.Y. 962 (N.Y. 1956)
Case details for

Claim of Zaepfel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ARLENE C. ZAEPFEL, Respondent, against E.I…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 12, 1956

Citations

309 N.Y. 962 (N.Y. 1956)
132 N.E.2d 327

Citing Cases

Matter of Miller v. Nat. Cabinet Co.

Whatever case claimant might have would depend entirely upon the testimony of Dr. Paul Reznikoff, who had no…

Smith v. Bell Aerospace

The Board's authority in assessing the credibility of witnesses includes the power to selectively adopt or…