From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 27, 2001
285 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: July 27, 2001.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Mark A. Young, Spencerport, respondent in person.

Before: Cardona P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.


DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION


Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 262 A.D.2d 702).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent's instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Matter of Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 27, 2001
285 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Young

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 27, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 920