From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Yorktown Auto Body v. St., N.Y. Dot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 25, 1990
166 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 25, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Conway, J.).


Petitioner, claiming that it was the highest responsible bidder, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondents' determination not to award it an exclusive contract from February 1, 1989 to January 31, 1990 to provide towing and emergency road service upon a portion of the Taconic State Parkway. Respondents had found that petitioner did not meet the 30-minute response time requirement of 17 NYCRR 185.4 (c) and awarded the contract to the second highest bidder. Supreme Court dismissed the petition upon a finding that the determination not to award the contract to petitioner was supported by a rational basis. We agree.

Respondents, upon performing response time tests from petitioner's facility, determined that petitioner was not able to respond to a call for service from the farthest point in the zone within 30 minutes. Moreover, respondents determined that petitioner no longer owned a second facility in closer proximity to the section of the parkway involved from which it had dispatched tow trucks to service the zone under a previous contract. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that petitioner has not met its burden of proving that respondents' determination lacked a rational basis (see, Matter of Schiavone Constr. Co. v. Larocca, 117 A.D.2d 440, 444, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 610; Matter of Brereton Assocs. v. Regan, 94 A.D.2d 886, 887, affd 60 N.Y.2d 807).

In addition, the contract period covered by the bid has now expired and, accordingly, the matter may be considered moot (see, Matter of Tri-State Aggregates Corp. v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 108 A.D.2d 645, 646; cf., Matter of Louis G. Bianchi, Inc. v. City of Troy, 92 A.D.2d 960).

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Yorktown Auto Body v. St., N.Y. Dot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 25, 1990
166 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Yorktown Auto Body v. St., N.Y. Dot

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of YORKTOWN AUTO BODY WORKS, INC., Appellant, v. STATE OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
563 N.Y.S.2d 177

Citing Cases

Matter of Granger v. St. of N.Y. Facilities

Thus, petitioner was afforded all the process that it is due under these circumstances. As to the merits of…