From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wright v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 1999
262 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 24, 1999

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered April 23, 1998 in Greene County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely.

Darryl Wright, Comstock, appellant in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, YESAWICH JR., PETERS and SPAIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Supreme Court properly dismissed, on timeliness grounds, petitioner's challenge to the administrative determination finding him guilty of violating numerous prison disciplinary rules. The final determination was issued on January 15, 1997 and, according to an affidavit submitted on behalf of respondents, was received by petitioner no later than January 16, 1997. The petition and executed order to show cause were not filed with the Greene County Clerk until May 28, 1997, at which point the proceeding was commenced (see, Matter of Erdheim v. Senkowski, 239 A.D.2d 686, 687, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 801). Inasmuch as petitioner failed to commence the proceeding within the four-month Statute of Limitations period (see, CPLR 217), the proceeding was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Erdheim v. Senkowski, supra; Matter of Manfredi v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 635). To the extent that petitioner now claims that he did not receive the final determination until March 17, 1997 due to a transfer to a different correctional facility, we note that petitioner did not raise this issue in his petition or before Supreme Court and instead raises it for the first time on appeal and it is, accordingly, not preserved for appellate review (see, Matter of Germenis v. Coughlin, 232 A.D.2d 738, 739).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Wright v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 1999
262 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Wright v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DARRYL WRIGHT, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 494

Citing Cases

Matter of Begun v. Goord

Respondent thereafter moved to dismiss the proceeding as, inter alia, untimely. Inasmuch as petitioner failed…

In the Matter of Taylor v. Dufrain

Petitioner does not claim that his incarceration prevented him from timely commencement or otherwise explain…