From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1979
67 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

February 5, 1979


In a contested accounting proceeding, the Attorney-General of the State of New York appeals from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Dutchess County, entered November 17, 1977, which denied his motion for an order vacating an executor's demand for a bill of particulars. Order modified, by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof, after the word "denied", the following: "except said motion is granted insofar as the demand relates to attorneys' fees, accountants' fees and executors' commissions". As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The burden of proving the reasonableness and necessity of all expenses incurred after the testator's death rests upon the accounting party (Matter of Shulsky, 34 A.D.2d 545). Since a party is not entitled to a bill of particulars with respect to a claim as to which he has the burden of proof, it was improper to deny the Attorney-General's motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars relating to attorneys' fees, accountants' fees and executors' fees. Suozzi, J.P., O'Connor, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1979
67 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Wolf

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of CHARLES F. WOLF, Deceased. LOUIS J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1979

Citations

67 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

In re Schroeder

The Surrogate has the ultimate responsibility to determine reasonable attorney fees in estate matters (see…

In re Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Proceedings of Otto

In an accounting, the fiduciaries have the burden of establishing the reasonableness and the value of the…