Summary
In Wise v. Michaelis (203 N.Y.S.2d 247, affd. 12 A.D.2d 788) cited by defendant, the court held that the practice of hairdressing and cosmetology by the petitioner in her own home in a residential district was an accessory use.
Summary of this case from People v. StaszynOpinion
January 9, 1961
In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, denying petitioner's application for a permit to use a portion of a residence building for the practice of hairdressing and cosmetology, the board appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 31, 1960, annulling its determination and directing it to issue the permit. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.