Opinion
May 6, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.).
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the denial of five separate grievances which he filed against two correction officers. The grievances essentially allege that the named correction officers were guilty of harassing the inmates in petitioner's section by, inter alia, playing cards and speaking loudly while the inmates were trying to sleep, attempting to provoke physical confrontations and making racist remarks. The correction officers denied all the allegations. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm.
Upon our review of the record, we find that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the denial of his grievances was affected by an error of law or was arbitrary and capricious ( see, Matter of Graziadei v. Clinton Correctional Facility, 256 A.D.2d 697; Matter of Abdul-Matiyn v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.; 251 A.D.2d 769, 770, appeal dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 1025; Matter of Bramble v. Laguna, 245 A.D.2d 928, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 810). The record indicates that each of the grievances was appropriately investigated and, under the circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the determinations crediting the denials of the correction officers over the conclusory allegations of petitioner and his inmate witnesses. Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.