Opinion
January 19, 1988
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
We find that the Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter the department) thoroughly examined and evaluated all possible environmental concerns, and amply satisfied the requirement that it take a "hard look" at such concerns and give a "reasoned elaboration" for its determination (Aldrich v Pattison, 107 A.D.2d 258, 263-265; Horn v International Business Machs. Corp., 110 A.D.2d 87, 93, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 602). In addition, the respondent Commissioner correctly conditioned the grant of the permit on the applicant's obtaining approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for the septic system proposed to be located on her property (cf., Matter of Tehan v Scrivani, 97 A.D.2d 769, 770).
We have considered the petitioners' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.