From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wilson v. Bd. of Ed., City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

holding that the petitioner could not seek to vacate the arbitration award because he was party neither to the arbitration nor to the collective bargaining agreement

Summary of this case from Galouch v. State

Opinion

May 3, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, King County (Golden, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner was employed by the respondent as a teacher from March 1984 until April 1996. After the respondent discharged the petitioner from employment, the petitioner's union initiated a grievance proceeding on her behalf, pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the union and the respondent. After the discharge of the petitioner was upheld, the union brought an arbitration pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, and the discharge was again upheld. The petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate the arbitration award. However, since the petitioner was a "party" to neither the collective bargaining agreement nor the arbitration, she lacks standing to seek vacatur of the arbitrator's award ( see, CPLR 7511; Chupka v. Lorenz-Schneider Co., 12 N.Y.2d 1; Matter of Alava v. Consolidated Edison Co., 183 A.D.2d 713).

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Wilson v. Bd. of Ed., City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

holding that the petitioner could not seek to vacate the arbitration award because he was party neither to the arbitration nor to the collective bargaining agreement

Summary of this case from Galouch v. State

holding that the petitioner could not seek to vacate the arbitration award because he was party neither to the arbitration nor to the collective bargaining agreement

Summary of this case from Galouch v. State

holding that the petitioner could not seek to vacate the arbitration award because he was party neither to the arbitration nor to the collective bargaining agreement

Summary of this case from Meades v. Wilmington Housing Authority
Case details for

Matter of Wilson v. Bd. of Ed., City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NANCY WILSON, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

Wolfinger v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.

"An employee whose claims are arbitrated under a collective bargaining agreement between an employer and a…

Stein v. Burnett

First. The demurrer to the evidence not only admitted that all the facts testified to were true, but also…