From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Williams v. Zambelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1999
265 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 12, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Barbara Zambelli, a Judge of the County Court, Westchester County, to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered December 22, 1998, convicting the petitioner of assault in the second degree, and cross application by the respondent Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, Westchester County, to impose sanctions on the petitioner.


ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the cross application is denied.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). Similarly, the extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see, Matter of Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16).

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, KRAUSMAN, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Williams v. Zambelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1999
265 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Williams v. Zambelli

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF DAVID WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. BARBARA ZAMBELLI, etc., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 829