From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Williams v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 4, 1998


Following a physical altercation with another inmate, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from fighting, creating a disturbance, disobeying a direct order and assaulting an inmate. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who witnessed the incident, revealed that petitioner exchanged punches with another inmate and failed to comply with several orders by a correction officer to stop. This version of events was confirmed by a confidential informant, whose statements to correction officers regarding the altercation were sufficiently detailed to allow the Hearing Officer to make an independent credibility assessment ( see, Matter of Green v. Coughlin, 225 A.D.2d 812). We find that this proof provided substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Hazel v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 736). Finally, our review of the record convinces us that petitioner was not denied an impartial hearing or the right to present witnesses.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Williams v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Williams v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 270

Citing Cases

Matter of Thomas v. Selsky

Notably, there is no requirement that the Hearing Officer personally interview the confidential informant in…