From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of William Floyd Un. v. William Floyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1989
149 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 24, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J., Leis, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 14, 1987 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 15, 1988, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 15, 1988 is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the order dated October 14, 1987 is vacated, the respondent's cross motion to dismiss the proceeding is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings with respect to the petitioner's motion for leave to amend its petition; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs.

CPLR 7506 (d) provides, in pertinent part, that "[i]f a party is represented by an attorney, papers to be served on the party shall be served upon his attorney". This rule states "the traditional and accepted practice" that once a party chooses to be represented by counsel, that counsel is deemed to be the party's agent in all respects relevant to that representation (Matter of Bianca v. Frank, 43 N.Y.2d 168, 173).

In this case, the arbitrator sought to deliver a duplicate original of the arbitration award to the petitioner's attorney. However, the document was mailed to the address of the petitioner school district rather than to the attorney's law office. Consequently we find that the delivery was only effectuated on March 9, 1987, when the attorney actually received the document. Accordingly, the commencement of this proceeding on or about June 5, 1987 was timely (see, Matter of Bianca v. Frank, supra, at 173).

Upon granting the cross motion to dismiss the proceeding, the Supreme Court declined to rule on the petitioner's motion for leave to amend its petition. In light of our determination herein, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a determination on the petitioner's motion for leave to amend its petition, as requested by the petitioner in its brief on appeal. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of William Floyd Un. v. William Floyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1989
149 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of William Floyd Un. v. William Floyd

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM FLOYD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 508