From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of William

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

September 27, 1996.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Before: Present Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


The evidence is sufficient to support Family Court's determination that respondents violated the terms of the order of protection by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on their son Lucas ( see, Family Ct Act § 1072). The conflicting testimony at the hearing presented an issue of credibility for the court to resolve, and we find no reason to disturb the court's determination ( see, Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, 902-903, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Paris, J. — Order of Protection.)


Summaries of

Matter of William

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1996
231 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of William

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM S. and Others, Infants. LEE S. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1996

Citations

231 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 377

Citing Cases

Cattaraugus Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Joshua R. (In re Tristyn R.)

Family Court credited the testimony that the mother allowed the father to have unsupervised contact with the…

In re Tristyn R.

Family Court credited the testimony that the mother allowed the father to have unsupervised contact with the…