From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of William

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1986
125 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 19, 1986

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent father was charged with abusing his four-year-old son by placing a rope around his left wrist and dragging the child, causing bleeding and removal of skin from the wrist, and with causing serious burns to the child's hand and wrist by placing the child's left arm into a lit oven. The court dismissed the petition after a hearing. This was error. At the time he was taken into protective custody, the child gave this explanation of the injury to four witnesses who so testified at the hearing, as authorized by Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (vi), and the father's only explanation was that the child had burned himself while preparing hot tea eight days before he was taken into protective custody. The one medical doctor to testify stated that the hand injury could have been caused by either radiant heat or a hot liquid, but that the wrist injury could not have been caused by a hot liquid. He found an almost circumferential uniform excoriation around the wrist which he described as "absolutely classic for a rope burn." He stated that the wrist injury was more recent than the hand injury, and that the photographs received in evidence, taken at the hospital, accurately depicted the child's condition when brought to the emergency room. A prima facie case of abuse having been proved (Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [ii]), the burden shifted to respondent to provide a credible explanation for all injuries observed. That burden was not met. The matter is remitted to Erie County Family Court for a dispositional hearing before a different Judge.


Summaries of

Matter of William

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 19, 1986
125 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of William

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM W., JR

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Matter of William

Accordingly, the Family Court order is reversed, and the grandfather's petition is dismissed. The DSS…

Matter of Michael

The court's finding was based upon the speculative inference that, because the child exhibited some of the…