From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wille

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 619 (N.Y. 1969)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1969

Decided October 30, 1969

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILLIAM C. HECHT, JR., J.

Samuel N. Greenspoon, William Mellon Eaton and John G. Houser for Intra Bank, S.A., appellant.

William E. Jackson and A. Sidney Holderness, Jr. for Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association), appellant.

Peter J. Malloy, Jr., Florindo M. DeRosa and Francis J. Mulderig for remaining appellants.

Powell Pierpoint, Francis C. Reed, Jeffrey F. Joseph and Eric B. Meyers for petitioner-respondent.

Robert M. Morgenthau, United States Attorney ( Lawrence W. Schilling, H. Thomas Coghill and Patricia M. Hynes of counsel), for United States of America, respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified not answered as unnecessary. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Matter of Wille

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1969
25 N.Y.2d 619 (N.Y. 1969)
Case details for

Matter of Wille

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK WILLE, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 30, 1969

Citations

25 N.Y.2d 619 (N.Y. 1969)
306 N.Y.S.2d 7
254 N.E.2d 224

Citing Cases

SATNICK v. Commissioner

See, e.g., United States v. Texas 42-1 USTC ¶ 9162, 314 U.S. 480 (1941); United States v. Oklahoma, 261 U.S.…

National Sur. Corp. v. Midland Bank Trust Co.

To prevent unjust enrichment of a bank in such a case would not impair the public policy (reflected in the…