From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wideman v. Murley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 22, 1989
155 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 22, 1989

Appeal from the Family Court of Albany County (Tobin, J.).


The parties were married in 1967 and divorced some 12 years later. They have one son for whose support respondent pays $40 per week pursuant to an order dated April 28, 1982. Petitioner commenced this proceeding to increase the amount of support to assist in paying the child's college expenses. On November 4, 1987, the parties and their attorneys appeared before a Hearing Examiner and the matter was set down for a hearing on January 14, 1988. Respondent and his attorney failed to appear on that date and the hearing was conducted in their absence. As a result of findings made by the Hearing Examiner, an order was made modifying the prior order and directing respondent to pay $3,500 to petitioner for one half the cost of higher education for their son for the 1987-1988 academic year, and a like amount for the 1988-1989 academic year. Further, the order directed respondent to continue paying petitioner $40 per week child support until further order of the court. The order was entered March 1, 1988, although respondent did not receive notice of it until March 14, 1988. Respondent filed written objections to the order on April 1, 1988. Family Court, relying on Family Court Act § 439 (e), dismissed the objections as untimely and this appeal followed.

Assuming that respondent's specific written objections to the Hearing Examiner's final order were timely filed, we find no basis to grant respondent relief. It is evident that respondent's failure to appear at the January 14, 1988 hearing resulted in a default, which can be opened only by acting pursuant to CPLR 317 or 5015. Respondent has not pursued either of these courses of conduct and, accordingly, is not entitled to relief.

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Wideman v. Murley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 22, 1989
155 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Wideman v. Murley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NANCY E. WIDEMAN, Respondent, v. JAMES R. MURLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 22, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 102

Citing Cases

Social Servs. v. Paulino F

Subsequently the Third Department reached the same conclusion. (Matter of Wideman v Murley, 155 A.D.2d 841…

Matter of Menaldino v. Johnson

It is well settled that defaults are subject to challenge not by direct appeal but by acting pursuant to CPLR…