From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Whyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1987
132 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 2, 1987

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Good Care Nursing Agency, Inc. (hereinafter the Agency) is an employment agency and nurses' registry which provides housekeepers, nurses aides, licensed practical nurses and registered nurses to nursing homes and private individuals. After some of the individuals whom it placed filed for unemployment compensation benefits, the Commissioner of Labor assessed the Agency for contributions. The Commissioner found that the Agency was the employer of the individuals it placed. Subsequently, an appeal was taken to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which initially overruled the Commissioner. However, the Commissioner asked for reconsideration in light of Matter of Gentile Nursing Servs. (Roberts) ( 65 N.Y.2d 622). The Board reopened the case and, upon reconsideration, sustained the determination that the Agency was liable for contributions. The Agency appeals.

Resolution of whether an employer is liable for contributions does not turn upon any one factor alone and the Board's determination of the issue must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence (see, e.g., Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts], 60 N.Y.2d 734, 736; Matter of Eastern Suffolk School of Music [Roberts], 91 A.D.2d 1123, lv denied 60 N.Y.2d 554). Here, the Agency advertises for and screens individuals which it places. Clients contact the Agency and the Agency selects the individual that it feels will meet the client's needs. Replacements are made by the Agency. Workers are paid on a regular basis by the Agency. The Agency bills the clients and collects reimbursement from them. Given these factual determinations, all of which are supported by substantial evidence, this court is constrained by the authority of Matter of Gentile Nursing Servs. (Roberts) (supra) to affirm the Board's decision.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Whyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1987
132 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Whyte

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CLARIBERT WHYTE, Respondent. GOOD CARE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Mississippi Employment Security Commission v. PDN, Inc.

In David Gentile, nurses could not secure their own replacements and clients were contractually forbidden to…

Matter of Whyte

Decided November 12, 1987 Appeal from (3d dept: 132 A.D.2d 758) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…