From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of White v. Freyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1999
265 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued September 17, 1999

October 28, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education, Ossining Union Free School District, dated March 15, 1996, which, after a hearing, affirmed the denial of the petitioner's application pursuant toRetirement and Social Security Law § 803 for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System, Tier II, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the determination of the Hearing Officer, the petitioner satisfied her initial burden of demonstrating that she met the requirements of Retirement and Social Security Law § 803(b)(3) (see, Matter of Rainson v. Board of Educ. of Manhasset Pub. Schools, 256 A.D.2d 411 ; cf., Matter of Forlenza v. Board of Educ. of Uniondale Union Free School Dist., 256 A.D.2d 409 ). The appellants failed to establish that at the time the petitioner was hired they had informed her of her right to join the retirement system. Accordingly, the petition should be granted (see, Matter of Scanlan v. Buffalo Pub. School Sys., 90 N.Y.2d 662 ; Matter of Spector v. Board of Educ., 251 A.D.2d 588 ).

JOY, J.P., FRIEDMANN, GOLDSTEIN, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of White v. Freyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1999
265 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of White v. Freyman

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF FRANCES WHITE, respondent, v. RICHARD FREYMAN, etc., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 143

Citing Cases

Matter of Serio v. B.O.E., Valley Stm. U. F

One document which indicates that the petitioner had "opt[ed]" not to join the Retirement System is undated…