From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of White

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 28, 1967
230 N.E.2d 735 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued September 21, 1967

Decided September 28, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, LAURENCE D. WOOD, S.

John Lawton and John H. Hughes, in person, for John H. Hughes, special guardian for Peter H. Sims and others, infants, appellant.

Charles H. Thompson for Jane S.W. Canfield and others, executors-respondents.

Ralph A. Jones and Neal R. Stamp for Cornell University, respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed insofar as it affirmed the Surrogate's determination that Cornell University was entitled to 10% of the appreciated value of the estate without taking into consideration the diminutive effect of the prior advances made by the executors to Cornell. Cornell University is only entitled to the appreciated value of the estate which is attributable to the undistributed portion of the testator's general bequest to Cornell. The order should be modified in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate's Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL concur; Judge BURKE dissents and votes to affirm upon the opinion at the Surrogate's Court.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of White

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 28, 1967
230 N.E.2d 735 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of White

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of ERNEST I. WHITE, Deceased. JOHN H. HUGHES…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 28, 1967

Citations

230 N.E.2d 735 (N.Y. 1967)
230 N.E.2d 735
284 N.Y.S.2d 95

Citing Cases

Matter of Palitz

Matter of Meerbaum extended the same equitable rule to allocation of capital gains. The idea was not entirely…

In re Accounting of Kassover

A residuary clause does not take precedence over a general legacy (see Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v Ebaugh,…