From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Whelan v. Rozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1989
155 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 20, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is axiomatic that a probationary employee may be discharged without a reason and without a hearing (see, Matter of York v McGuire, 63 N.Y.2d 760). The courts will intervene only where it is shown that the discharge was made in bad faith, and therefore was arbitrary and capricious, or was due to constitutionally impermissible reasons, or was prohibited by statute or case law (see, Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 637). The burden of proof is on the employee (see, Matter of Bergamini v Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 62 N.Y.2d 897), and the "mere belief of bad faith" (D'Aiuto v Department of Water Resources, 51 A.D.2d 700, 701) or conclusory allegations will not suffice (see, Matter of Mazur v Ryan, 98 A.D.2d 974).

Measured against these standards, the petition herein was clearly insufficient. The petitioner conceded that he was never given a reason for the discharge, and his speculation as to what the reasons might be remained only that — mere speculation. Similarly, since no reason for the discharge was given and none was publicly disseminated, the petitioner was not entitled to a name-clearing hearing (see, Matter of Lentlie v Egan, 61 N.Y.2d 874). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Whelan v. Rozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1989
155 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Whelan v. Rozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH G. WHELAN, Appellant, v. SAMUEL J. ROZZI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 660

Citing Cases

Reynolds v. Crosson

Absent statute or rule to the contrary, a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and…

McAdam v. Suffolk Cnty. Police Dep't

Furthermore, the case law is clear when a judge presiding over an Article 78 proceeding has to determine…