From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Western v. MacKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ontario County, Curran, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We reject respondents' contention that the cooperative service contract entered into between petitioner Board of Education of Gorham-Middlesex Central School District and the Wayne-Finger Lakes Board of Cooperative Education Services for the provision of itinerant teaching services for a one-half time Spanish teacher (see, Education Law § 1950 [bb] [3]) fell within the ambit of the grievance provision of the parties' collective bargaining agreement. In our view, respondents' demand for arbitration failed to satisfy either of the Liverpool inquiries (see, Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 N.Y.2d 509). Thus, Supreme Court properly granted petitioners' application to stay arbitration (see, CPLR 7503 [b]).


Summaries of

Matter of Western v. MacKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1992
187 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Western v. MacKenzie

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LYNN WESTERN, as Superintendent of Schools of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Matter of Western v. MacKenzie

Decided March 30, 1993 Appeal from (4th Dept: 187 A.D.2d 1000) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Matter of Newfield Central School District

Accordingly, it makes little sense to require petitioner, under the guise of a broad arbitration clause, to…