From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

We're Associates Co. v. Bear

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1971
272 N.E.2d 338 (N.Y. 1971)

Opinion

Argued May 10, 1971

Decided May 26, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Joseph Jaspan, County Attorney ( Benedict F. Romano and F. Stuart Darrow of counsel), for appellants.

Stephen Van R. Ulman for We're Associates Company, respondent.

Francis F. Doran, Town Attorney ( Gino Papa of counsel), for Town of North Hempstead, respondent.

Pratt, Caemmerer Cleary for Incorporated Villages of Brookville, North Hills, Old Westbury and Roslyn Harbor, amici curiae.


Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

We're Associates Co. v. Bear

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1971
272 N.E.2d 338 (N.Y. 1971)
Case details for

We're Associates Co. v. Bear

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WE'RE ASSOCIATES COMPANY, Respondent, v. FRANKLIN BEAR et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 26, 1971

Citations

272 N.E.2d 338 (N.Y. 1971)
272 N.E.2d 338
323 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

Matter of Town of Bedford v. Vil., Mount Kisco

Though the right to be heard is also granted to the adjoining municipality, the right of judicial review is…

Town, Hempstead v. Vil., Rockville Centre

Assuming arguendo that the Village had effected a de facto zoning change by dedicating the property in 1937…