From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Welker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1994
205 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 2, 1994

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's conclusion that claimant voluntarily left his employment as an automobile salesperson without good cause for noncompelling reasons. Claimant conceded that his supervisor was honest with him about the money he could earn while on commission, but he testified that he was nonetheless unhappy with his earnings. Under the circumstances, the Board could properly conclude that claimant's decision to leave his employment was motivated by his dissatisfaction with his salary and was, therefore, without good cause.

Mercure, J.P., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Welker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1994
205 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Welker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RONALD E. WELKER, Appellant. JOHN F. HUDACS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 61

Citing Cases

Matter of Abrams

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits on…

In the Matter of Sun

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant…