From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 22, 1994
207 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 22, 1994

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant testified that she left her job as a credit manager and moved to Florida because certain incidents which occurred over a two-year period caused her to feel unsafe in New York City. Claimant presented no evidence at the hearing that she suffered from stress as a result of these incidents or that she was advised by a doctor to move due to her fears. In addition, the incidents about which claimant testified were unrelated to her employment and it has been held that such fear does not constitute good cause for leaving one's job. Under the circumstances, the Board's decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause while work was still available is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 22, 1994
207 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Weinstein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SYLVIA WEINSTEIN, Appellant. BENARTEX, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 561