From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Weinberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 31, 1940
259 App. Div. 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

May 31, 1940.

S.C. Lewis of counsel [ Einar Chrystie, attorney], for the petitioner.

Robert Daru of counsel [ Maurice Hellman with him on the brief; Daru, Hellman Winter, attorneys], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., TOWNLEY, DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ.


It has been conclusively established by the evidence presented in this proceeding that the respondent had been guilty of using the services of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon, laymen, to solicit and procure retainers in personal injury cases pursuant to agreement to pay them a part of the fees collected by him in such cases. It further appears that payments were made by him to them in accordance with this agreement. Between the years 1925 and 1932 the respondent obtained retainers in more than 800 cases through the efforts of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon.

The respondent should be disbarred.


Respondent disbarred.


Summaries of

Matter of Weinberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 31, 1940
259 App. Div. 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Weinberger

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of S. SAMUEL WEINBERGER (Also Known as SIDNEY S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 31, 1940

Citations

259 App. Div. 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
20 N.Y.S.2d 339

Citing Cases

Matter of Rothenberg

While most of these contentions appear to be uncontrovertible, they do not appear to be of much significance.…