From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wein v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1982
437 N.E.2d 275 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided May 13, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Norman Eric Teitler and Barry Gene Rhodes for appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Elissa Hutner of counsel), for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), judgment reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, with directions to remand to the Fire Commissioner for imposition of an appropriate sanction under section 487a-12.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. In imposing a penalty authorized by section 75 of the Civil Service Law, but not authorized by section 487a-12.0 of the Administrative Code, the commissioner acted without regard to subdivision 4 of section 76 of the Civil Service Law and, therefore, in excess of his authority.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Wein v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1982
437 N.E.2d 275 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Wein v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HERBERT WEIN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 13, 1982

Citations

437 N.E.2d 275 (N.Y. 1982)
437 N.E.2d 275
452 N.Y.S.2d 16

Citing Cases

Borges v. McGuire

The legal relationship between these two sections is defined by Civil Service Law § 76 (4) which provides in…

Matter of Montella v. Bratton

rt, that "[a]ny officer or employee believing himself aggrieved by a penalty or punishment * * * imposed…