Opinion
October 15, 1998
Respondent found petitioner guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from damaging State property after he returned a jailhouse lawyer's manual to the facility law library with a chapter missing. We confirm respondent's determination. To the extent that petitioner raises an issue of substantial evidence, we find that the determination of guilt is sufficiently supported by proof that the chapter was intact immediately before the book was loaned to petitioner but was missing when he returned it to the law library ( see, Matter of Navarro v. Selsky, 249 A.D.2d 654). We further find that petitioner's claims of inadequate assistance are meritless. The assistant interviewed those witnesses that petitioner wished to have testify and made a meaningful attempt to furnish him with all of the documents and information that he requested ( see, Matter of Eckert v. Selsky, 247 A.D.2d 728). Petitioner's remaining contentions are unpreserved for our review and, in any event, lack merit.
Mikoll, J. P., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.