From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Weaver v. Ambach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 17, 1985
107 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 17, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Torraca, J.).


Petitioner was appointed by respondent Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of the City of Troy (board) to serve as head boys' basketball coach at Troy High School for the 1983-1984 season. Respondent John A. Moser, Jr., a former head boys' basketball coach at Troy High School who had sought the 1983-1984 appointment, commenced an administrative proceeding to challenge petitioner's appointment. Moser alleged that petitioner was not eligible for appointment as head boys' basketball coach because he was not a certified teacher and there were certified teachers with coaching qualifications and experience available (see 8 NYCRR 135.4 [c] [7] [i] [ c] [3], such as Moser himself. Respondent Commissioner of Education (commissioner) agreed with this contention and concluded that petitioner was ineligible for appointment as the head basketball coach for 1983-1984 under 8 NYCRR 135.4 (c) (7) (i) ( c) (3). The commissioner also concluded, sua sponte, that petitioner was not eligible to coach pursuant to 8 NYCRR 135.4 (c) (7) (i) ( c) (4) because that regulation applies solely to coaches with continuous service in public school since September 1, 1974, and petitioner's experience was in nonpublic schools. Thus, the commissioner annulled the board's appointment of petitioner as head boys' basketball coach for 1983-1984.

Petitioner then commenced this proceeding to annul the commissioner's determination and to be reinstated as head boys' basketball coach at Troy High School during 1983-1984. A temporary restraining order was granted to petitioner, who was thus able to coach the Troy High School boys' basketball team during the 1983-1984 season. After the season was over, Special Term concluded that the commissioner's interpretation of the regulations was arbitrary and granted the petition. This appeal by the commissioner and Moser followed.

The parties devote substantial attention to the question of whether this appeal is moot. In light of the facts that the 1983-1984 scholastic basketball season is over and that petitioner has resigned his position as head boys' basketball coach at Troy High School, the rights of the parties will not be affected by our determination and the interests of the parties are no longer an immediate consequence of the judgment. Thus, the matter is moot (see, e.g., Matter of Marsha W.W. v. Capital Dist. Psychiatric Center, 103 A.D.2d 988). We further conclude that there is insufficient reason to consider the merits of this case under the exception to the mootness doctrine because it is not evident that the regulations in question will typically evade review (see, e.g., Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714-715; Matter of Board of Educ. v. Ambach, 97 A.D.2d 600, 601).

Appeal dismissed, as moot, without costs. Main, J.P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Weaver v. Ambach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 17, 1985
107 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Weaver v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT WEAVER, Respondent, v. GORDON AMBACH, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Imrie v. Ratto

Plaintiff's contention that Supreme Court also erred in failing to join the corporation as a necessary party…

Imrie v. Ratto

Plaintiff's contention that Supreme Court also erred in failing to join the corporation as a necessary party…