From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

We Stay/Nos Quedamos Committee v. New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 1997
240 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 19, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


In light of the support in the record for respondents' conclusion that the subject action is an aspect of "routine or continuing agency administration and management" ( 6 NYCRR 617.5 [c] [20]), and given that this Court has only a limited review function ( see, Matter of Acton v. Wallace, 112 A.D.2d 581, 583, affd 67 N.Y.2d 953), we agree with the IAS Court that the challenged administrative action has a rational basis and we should not interfere with it. We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

We Stay/Nos Quedamos Committee v. New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 1997
240 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

We Stay/Nos Quedamos Committee v. New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WE STAY/NOS QUEDAMOS COMMITTEE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 748

Citing Cases

Matter of City Coal. v. Guiliani

We agree with the IAS Court that petitioner-appellant, having no "legally cognizable injury", is without…