From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wattecamps v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1961
13 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

June 19, 1961


Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review and annul a determination by respondent which revoked petitioner's license to operate a motor vehicle on the ground of gross negligence. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 13, 1961, the proceeding was transferred to this court for determination (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296). Petitioner testified that, at the time of the accident, he was proceeding despite the fact that there was practically no visibility. Determination modified by suspending petitioner's license for 30 days. As so modified, determination confirmed, without costs. While it may not be said, on this record, that the determination was unsupported by substantial evidence (cf. Matter of Deutsch v. Hults, 10 A.D.2d 724), we believe that under all the circumstances revocation of petitioner's license was not warranted. Beldock, Acting P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Wattecamps v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1961
13 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Matter of Wattecamps v. Hults

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD J. WATTECAMPS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM S. HULTS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 1009 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Matter of Szymanski v. Hults

In our opinion, the evidence supports respondent's findings. Nolan, P.J., Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ.,…

Matter of Morgan v. Tofany

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent's determination suspending petitioner's…