From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wareham v. Wareham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1970
34 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

April 6, 1970


In a support proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered June 10, 1969, which denied appellant's motion for a rehearing of the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. The prior order dated September 27, 1967 is binding as to all matters that were litigated or should have been litigated. Since the matter now alleged does not fall into the category of newly discovered evidence, it was proper to deny a reopening of the issues inherently decided under the order of September 27, 1967 ( Statter v. Statter, 2 N.Y.2d 668; Matter of Merritt v. Merritt, 259 App. Div. 242, app. dsmd. 285 N.Y. 561). Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Wareham v. Wareham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1970
34 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Matter of Wareham v. Wareham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDNA V. WAREHAM, Respondent, v. FRANCIS T.J. WAREHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1970

Citations

34 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Matter of Neita W. v. Canute W

However, the requirement of proof of changed circumstances has been relaxed where the initial Supreme Court…

Shapiro v. Shapiro

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by…