From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Walton v. Bd. of Educ

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Feb 4, 1972
68 Misc. 2d 935 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)

Opinion

February 4, 1972

Leonard S. Clark and Carl Jay Nathanson for petitioner.

Frank E. Harwood, Jr., for respondents.


Petition pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR annulling respondents' suspension of petitioner from attendance at Glen Cove City High School and for related relief is granted.

Petitioner, Lynn Walton, now 15 years and 5 months of age, was suspended by order of the Principal of Glen Cove City High School on November 5, 1971 for a period of five school days. Petitioner was also assigned to home tutoring effective November 12, 1971. Application was thereafter made to have petitioner admitted to one of the programs of BOCES (Board of Cooperative Educational Services) in place and stead of home tutoring.

Under section 3214 (subd. 3, par. b) of the Education Law a principal may be delegated the authority to suspend a minor for a period not to exceed five school days. In the case of a suspension under paragraph b, the pupil "shall, on request, be given an opportunity for an informal conference with the principal" (subd. 3, par. d; emphasis supplied). Here there is evidence that the principal and others notified petitioner's mother of the complaints and requested her attendance at informal hearings. Numerous prior incidents are alleged over a long period of time and various conferences were held as a result thereof. The question raised herein is whether or not the assignment to home tutoring and the application to BOCES immediately subsequent to the five-school-day suspension, without a hearing, constituted arbitrary and capricious treatment of petitioner in violation of the applicable statutes.

Paragraph c of subdivision 3 of section 3214 Educ. of the Education Law provides that: "No pupil may be suspended for a period in excess of five school days unless such pupil and the person in parental relation to such pupil shall have had an opportunity for a fair hearing, upon reasonable notice, at which such pupil shall have the right of representation by counsel, with the right to question witnesses against such pupil and to present witness and other evidence on his behalf. Where a minor has been suspended in accordance with this section by a superintendent of schools * * * the superintendent shall personally hear and determine the proceeding or may, in his discretion, designate a hearing officer to conduct the hearing."

Paragraph e of subdivision 3 of this section mandatorily requires that immediate steps be taken "Where a minor has been suspended as insubordinate or disorderly and said minor is of compulsory attendance age * * * for his attendance upon instruction elsewhere". Therefore the assignment to home tutoring was required, albeit instituted subsequent to the five-day period. However, having gone beyond the five-school-day period without a hearing, it is contrary to section 3214 (subd. 3, par. c) of the Education Law. As hereinabove noted petitioner is of compulsory attendance age (since she is under 16 years of age) and therefore must attend upon full time instruction (see Education Law, § 3205, subd. 1, par. a; § 2, subd. 11).

Since petitioner had not been notified of the right to a hearing, nor was a hearing held prior to the expiration of the five-school-day suspension, and over three months have elapsed since this suspension, without a hearing, the court finds that the actions taken were in violation of the Education Law. (See Matter of MacDonald v. Tompkins, 67 Misc.2d 338; Ladson v. Board of Educ., Union Free School Dist. No. 9, Town of Hempstead, 67 Misc.2d 173; Matter of George v. Fiore, 62 Misc.2d 429; Matter of Reid v. Nyquist, 65 Misc.2d 718.)

Accordingly, respondents shall immediately reinstate petitioner, Lynn Walton, to her regular classes at Glen Cove City High School. This determination is without prejudice to respondents, upon due and proper notice, conducting a full-scale hearing, as noted above, to determine the fitness of this student to remain in regular classes at this school.


Summaries of

Matter of Walton v. Bd. of Educ

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Feb 4, 1972
68 Misc. 2d 935 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Walton v. Bd. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LYNN WALTON, an Infant, by PAULINE WALTON, Her Mother and…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: Feb 4, 1972

Citations

68 Misc. 2d 935 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1972)
328 N.Y.S.2d 932

Citing Cases

Matter of Turner v. Kowalski

A review of the legislative history of subdivision 3 of section 3214 shows that the "five day dividing line"…

Matter of Johnson v. Bd. of Educ

The fact apparent from the letter of December 10, 1976 is that Sharon was indeed suspended from regular class…