From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Walker v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1999
260 A.D.2d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 15, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review, inter alia, a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.


Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules, including possessing a weapon, making threats and disobeying a direct order. Based upon the recommendation in the disciplinary determination, the Time Allowance Committee (hereinafter Committee) withheld six months of petitioner's good time credit. Petitioner challenges his detention at the correctional facility as improper, contending that he was not afforded an opportunity to be heard before the Committee and that the disciplinary determination upon which the Committee relied was not supported by substantial evidence.

Initially, we note that because petitioner was conditionally released on February 5, 1999, the challenge to the procedural irregularities in connection with his loss of good time is moot ( see generally, Matter of Alstranner v. Selsky, 238 A.D.2d 658; Matter of Santos v. Coughlin, 201 A.D.2d 849, 850). With respect to his challenge to the disciplinary determination, however, although petitioner has been released from custody, this issue cannot be considered moot as "petitioner is entitled to have an institutional record free from improperly obtained findings of disciplinary rule violations" ( Matter of Grant v. Senkowski, 146 A.D.2d 948, 949; see, Matter of Crosson v. Coughlin, 197 A.D.2d 864, 865). Nevertheless, the detailed misbehavior report and corroborating testimony presented at the disciplinary hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966).

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Walker v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 15, 1999
260 A.D.2d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Walker v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DARRELL WALKER, Petitioner, v. DANIEL SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 770

Citing Cases

Walker v. Fischer

ence supporting that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of assaulting staff, interfering…

Ryhal v. Annucci

Accordingly, petitioner's challenge to the Board's prior decisions denying his release have been rendered…