From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Suffolk County Medical Society, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

May 3, 1982


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Suffolk County Medical Society, Inc. which found no basis to impose disciplinary measures against its member respondent William Diefenbach, M.D., proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. A physician may bring a CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge his expulsion from, or denial of admission to, a medical society upon a showing of "economic necessity" for membership. ( Matter of Salter v. New York State Psychological Assn., 14 N.Y.2d 100, 106-107; Matter of Kurk v Medical Soc. of County of Queens, 46 Misc.2d 790, 795, revd on other grounds 24 A.D.2d 897, affd 18 N.Y.2d 928; Dietz v. American Dental Assn., 479 F. Supp. 554, 557.) However, in this case the determination was in favor of the member physician and the complainant-petitioner does not qualify among those parties who would be personally aggrieved thereby. (See Matter of Donohue v Cornelius, 17 N.Y.2d 390, 396.) Accordingly, the petitioner does not have standing to bring the instant proceeding and dismissal is required. (See Matter of Colon v. Kirby, 81 A.D.2d 638.) Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wade v. Suffolk County Medical Society, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Wade v. Suffolk County Medical Society, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DONALD WADE, Petitioner, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY MEDICAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Knox v. Hines Lbr. Co.

There are many decisions of this court which recognize the validity of trust estates and that they may be…

Holcomb v. Holcomb

The testator expressly declares that he "expects" the deduction to be made. This goes further than the…