From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volgarino v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1991
173 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 2, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County.


Petitioner was charged with possessing contraband and smuggling or attempting to smuggle an item into the correctional facility. We reject petitioner's contentions that the hearing was conducted in violation of his due process rights and that the Hearing Officer's determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner was advised that confidential testimony was being taken and, upon examining that information as relayed by the Correctional Officer, we not only find that the information was reliable, but that there was a need to conceal the source's identity and the testimony to protect prison security (see, Matter of Gibson v LeFevre, 133 A.D.2d 978, 979-980; Matter of Harris v Coughlin, 116 A.D.2d 896, 897, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 610, 1047). In addition, this testimony, coupled with the misbehavior report and the other testimony taken at the hearing, constituted substantial evidence to support the determination (see, Matter of McClean v LeFevre, 142 A.D.2d 911, 912; Matter of Harris v Coughlin, supra). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Volgarino v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 1991
173 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Volgarino v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL VOLGARINO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 2, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
569 N.Y.S.2d 803

Citing Cases

Matter of Serra v. Selsky

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging the determination finding him guilty of unauthorized…

Matter of Breazil v. Senkowski

We affirm. Despite his contentions to the contrary, petitioner was advised that confidential testimony was…