From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vola v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1983
96 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 5, 1983


Proceeding pursuant to section 298 Exec. of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 14, 1983, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing petitioner's complaint of race or color discrimination, after a hearing. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The agency's determination that no acts of unlawful discrimination based upon race or color were committed here is supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176), as respondent Northwest Airlines, Inc., articulated legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions toward petitioner which he failed to show were a pretext for such determination ( McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 U.S. 792; Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v Burdine, 450 U.S. 248). In this proceeding, petitioner additionally seeks to argue that the denial of Northwest Airlines, Inc., of his request for time off to attend a precana conference was a discriminatory practice in violation of section 296 (subd 10, par [a]) of the Executive Law. We note, however, that on February 7, 1980, the State Division of Human Rights issued a determination after investigation finding no probable cause with reference to the charge of creed discrimination. That determination further indicated that "[a]ny party to this proceeding may appeal this order to the State Human Rights Appeal Board * * * within 15 days after service of this order". Having failed to do so, petitioner cannot now seek judicial review of the finding of no probable cause to believe that Northwest Airlines, Inc., discriminated against him on the basis of his creed (see Executive Law, § 298; Matter of Moskal v State of New York, Executive Dept. Div. of Human Rights, 36 A.D.2d 46, 48-49). We have examined petitioner's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vola v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1983
96 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Vola v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE VOLA, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE HUMAN RIGHTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

McPherson v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination that petitioner…

Matter of United Parcel Service, Inc.

Proceedings dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner failed to file timely notices of appeal…