From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vistocci v. Seebeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 10, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother did not allege any reason to justify a reconsideration of the visitation order dated February 17, 1993, entered upon consent of the parties, inasmuch as no material change in circumstances was presented ( see, Family Ct Act § 467 [b] [ii]; Matter of Induddi v. Moore, 214 A.D.2d 616). The mother's remaining contention is without merit.

Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Vistocci v. Seebeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Vistocci v. Seebeck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS VISTOCCI, Respondent, v. CHRISTINE SEEBECK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

Matter of King v. King

ORDERED that the father is awarded one bill of costs. It is well established that to modify of an order of…

In the Matter of Manos v. Manos

We affirm. The general rule is that in the absence of a subsequent change in circumstance, the court should…