From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vincent Gerald C. Suffolk County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1990
168 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 31, 1990

Appeal from the Family Court, Suffolk County (Auperin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the petitioning agency failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent natural father had failed to keep the agency apprised of his location for a period of six months. Accordingly, the agency was not relieved of its obligations under Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a) (see, Matter of Brown, 139 Misc.2d 550; Matter of Antoinette Frances G., 135 Misc.2d 1034; see also, Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 383, n 5). In this 31772 regard, we note that the agency's trial counsel failed to lay a proper foundation for the admission into evidence of the file of the caseworker assigned to the infant (see, Matter of Leon RR, 48 N.Y.2d 117; Carrieri, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 52A, Social Services Law § 384-b, at 133-134). Further, contrary to the Law Guardian's appellate contention, the agency did not seek to be relieved of its obligations on the ground that it would not be in the best interest of the infant to be reunited with his natural father. Consequently, the Family Court did not address that issue.

However, we would be remiss if we did not make the following observations; at oral argument, it was disclosed that during the pendency of this appeal, the agency has apparently taken no further action to discharge its statutory responsibilities with regard to the infant. The agency cannot "retain [this infant] in the limbo of foster care while taking neither the actions deemed essential by the Legislature to facilitate the [infant's] return to [his natural father] nor those necessary to otherwise secure a permanent home for [him]" (Matter of Antoinette Frances G., 135 Misc.2d 1034, 1043, supra). Therefore, under the circumstances, our determination is without prejudice to the agency expeditiously commencing further appropriate proceedings (see, Social Services Law § 384-b; see also, L 1983, ch 911, § 1). Lawrence, J.P., Kooper, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Vincent Gerald C. Suffolk County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1990
168 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Vincent Gerald C. Suffolk County

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VINCENT GERALD C. SUFFOLK COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
563 N.Y.S.2d 506

Citing Cases

Matter of Charlotte

Ordered that the decrees are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The…