From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Village of Canastota, Queensboro Farm Prods

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1975
330 N.E.2d 648 (N.Y. 1975)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 1975

Decided April 3, 1975

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN R. TENNEY, J.

Charles T. Beeching, Jr., Thomas S. Evans and Joe Schapiro for appellant. Ralph J. Balducci, Village Attorney (Dante M. Scaccia and Richard J. Brickwedde of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. Subdivision 2 of section 452 of the General Municipal Law provides, in pertinent part, that "sewer rents may be established and imposed only by * * * local law or ordinance" in the case of villages such as the petitioner.

In light of this specific restriction petitioner lacked authority to establish sewer rates by contract, and therefore the contract of 1966 was of no force and effect.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Village of Canastota, Queensboro Farm Prods

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1975
330 N.E.2d 648 (N.Y. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Village of Canastota, Queensboro Farm Prods

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between the VILLAGE OF CANASTOTA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 3, 1975

Citations

330 N.E.2d 648 (N.Y. 1975)
330 N.E.2d 648
369 N.Y.S.2d 700

Citing Cases

Zanesville v. Mohawk Data

Since the contract in its entirety is invalid and void, the arbitration clause contained therein is likewise…

Welch Foods, Inc. v. Wilson

At the very least, the provision in paragraph 5 is ambiguous and does not warrant the dismissal of the first…