From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vidal v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 8, 2000
273 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 8, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Joseph Vidal, Fallsburg, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of solicitation after it was discovered that he had attempted to open an outside money market account. The misbehavior report, as well as the testimony of petitioner and his requested witnesses, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Knight v. Goord, 267 A.D.2d 523,lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 760). Petitioner's contention that the purpose of the money was for legal fees raised a credibility issue properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Crosby v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 931, 701 N.Y.S.2d 752). Furthermore, we also reject petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer's signature on the bottom of the disbursement form constituted direct involvement in the incident. The record reveals that the Hearing Officer's involvement in the matter was, at best, tangential and that he was not aware of the particulars of the underlying incident prior to the start of the hearing (see, 7 NYCRR 254.1; Matter of Reynolds v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 743, 704 N.Y.S.2d 389). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Vidal v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 8, 2000
273 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Vidal v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH VIDAL, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 240

Citing Cases

Matter of Handley v. Selsky

uring the hearing and, accordingly, his claim is unpreserved for our review (see, Matter of Campanale v.…

In the Matter of Wheeler

termination made as a result of a hearing at which evidence was taken pursuant to direction by law, the only…